In which scenario is a lawyer likely facing a clear conflict of interest?

A lawyer is likely facing a clear conflict of interest when representing opposing interests, maintaining a business relationship with a client, or having previously represented the client. Each of these scenarios presents inherent risks of conflicting loyalties or interests that could compromise the lawyer's ability to represent clients impartially and effectively.

When a lawyer represents a party's opposing interest, there is a direct conflict because the lawyer cannot adequately advocate for one client without potentially harming the interests of the other client. This situation violates the duty of loyalty owed to each client and can lead to ethical breaches.

A business relationship with a client can also create conflicts, particularly if the lawyer’s personal interests interfere with their responsibilities to their client. This situation can lead to divided loyalties, where the lawyer may struggle to prioritize the client’s needs over their business interests.

Having previously represented the client can lead to a conflict if the current representation involves matters that are substantially related to the former representation. In such cases, confidential information gained during the previous representation could be misused, even inadvertently, which raises ethical concerns and can harm the client's interests.

Each scenario presents distinct challenges to maintaining ethical standards and ensuring that a lawyer is able to represent their clients with undivided loyalty and care, highlighting why this answer encompasses all