What is an additional reason under California Evidence Code for breaching attorney-client privilege?

The option indicating that an attorney may breach the attorney-client privilege if the lawyer believes disclosure prevents a crime likely to cause bodily harm aligns with California Evidence Code Section 956. This section allows for the disclosure of client communications when there is a substantial and imminent threat of harm to an individual, indicating that the attorney may act to prevent that harm.

This is based on the principle that the need to protect individuals from immediate danger can outweigh the need to maintain confidentiality. It acknowledges that while the attorney-client privilege is important, there are circumstances where public safety considerations necessitate action.

Other options do not establish grounds under California law for breaching attorney-client privilege. A client changing their mind about confidentiality does not, in itself, create a legal basis for the attorney to disclose privileged information. A written waiver by the client would actually create the ability for disclosure, rather than serve as a reason for breaching privilege. Lastly, financial distress of the attorney does not constitute a valid reason to disclose privileged communications, as the integrity of the attorney-client relationship should be maintained regardless of the attorney's financial situation.