What must a lawyer do before settling a claim for an unrepresented former client?

Before settling a claim for an unrepresented former client, a lawyer is required to ensure that the client is fully informed of the implications of the settlement. This obligation stems from the lawyer's duty to maintain the trust and confidence of their former clients and to ensure that they understand the consequences of their decisions.

When representing a client, a lawyer has a fiduciary duty to act in the best interest of that client. This responsibility extends even after the representation has ended, particularly in situations involving settlement discussions. It is critical for the lawyer to explain the terms of the settlement, the potential outcomes, and any rights the former client may be relinquishing. This ensures that the former client can make an informed decision, reflecting the ethics standards for legal profession practices.

The other options involve procedures that are not specifically required in the context of settling a claim for an unrepresented former client. For instance, seeking court approval is generally not necessary unless mandated by specific circumstances or rules. Drafting a comprehensive agreement would typically occur afterward, and obtaining a waiver could apply in certain contexts but is not an overarching requirement for settlement discussions with former clients. Thus, the correct answer focuses on ensuring the former client's informed understanding, which is a fundamental part of the lawyer-client relationship.