What responsibilities does a lawyer have when failing to inform a client about a settlement offer?

When a lawyer fails to inform a client about a settlement offer, the primary responsibility that comes into play is the scope of representation and the need for effective client communication. In the attorney-client relationship, a lawyer is expected to keep the client informed about all significant developments in their case, including any settlement offers made by the opposing party. This obligation is fundamental to ensuring that the client can make informed decisions regarding their legal options.

The duty to communicate effectively encompasses not only relaying information about offers and proposals but also advising clients on the implications, risks, and benefits of accepting or rejecting a settlement. If a lawyer neglects this duty, it can lead to a breach of fiduciary duty, which diminishes the client's ability to make an informed choice about their case.

While filing deadlines and responsibilities to the court and opposing counsel are important aspects of legal practice, they do not address the core relationship of communication and consent that lies at the heart of effective representation. Neglecting to communicate a settlement offer can directly impact a client's rights and outcomes and reflects on the quality and integrity of the legal representation provided. Therefore, the most fitting response is focused on the necessity of maintaining an open line of communication regarding the scope of representation.