Which of the following could prompt a lawyer to report themselves to ethics?

A lawyer may feel compelled to report themselves regarding professional misconduct when they face disciplinary action in another jurisdiction. This obligation arises from the ethical standards that require attorneys to maintain honesty and integrity in their practice. When a lawyer is disciplined by another state or federal bar association, it can reflect poorly not only on their conduct in that jurisdiction but also raise questions about their fitness to practice in their home jurisdiction.

The ethical rules often stipulate that attorneys must disclose certain types of conduct that might undermine the trust and confidence necessary for the legal profession. By self-reporting such disciplinary issues, a lawyer upholds these standards and demonstrates accountability, recognizing that misconduct in one jurisdiction can have ramifications elsewhere.

In contrast, finding a favorable ruling, winning a significant lawsuit, or receiving negative client feedback do not inherently involve ethical breaches that would necessitate self-reporting. These scenarios are more about the outcomes of a lawyer's practice rather than their ethical conduct. Thus, only the instance of being disciplined in another jurisdiction directly leads to the duty to report to ethics authorities.