Which statement accurately describes attorney-client privilege?

The statement indicating that attorney-client privilege is narrower and applies only when testifying about legal services is accurate in that it captures a key aspect of the privilege. Attorney-client privilege specifically protects confidential communications between a lawyer and their client related to the provision of legal advice or services. It is designed to encourage open and honest communication between clients and their legal counsel, which is essential for effective representation.

This privilege applies specifically in scenarios where a lawyer is called to testify regarding communications with a client. For the privilege to exist, the communication must have been made in the context of the attorney-client relationship, and it must have been intended to be confidential. Thus, the privilege does not necessarily extend to all interactions or all discussions outside of the context of seeking legal advice.

In contrast, the definitions of the other options do not accurately reflect the nuances of attorney-client privilege. The assertion that it applies to all communications between lawyer and client fails to consider the need for the communication to specifically involve the seeking of legal advice. The statement suggesting that it is broader than confidentiality overlooks that confidentiality encompasses a wider range of information about the client's affairs that may not be covered under the specific attorney-client privilege. Lastly, the notion that the privilege is only applicable in criminal cases is incorrect, as